Skip to content
HES.
Contact Us
Solutions
Clean WaterControl pathogens, biofilm and cost where conventional treatment failsAir & Infection ControlReduce airborne pathogens and infection risk, with no ozoneEnergyCut energy and recover it from the systems you already runAgriculture & SoilUse less water and fertiliser while protecting yield and soil
Sectors
Healthcare & HospitalsKeep patients safe and your accreditation secure, with infection, Legionella and AMR risk reducedWater & WastewaterStay in consent, and cut the energy and chemicals it takes to get thereCommercial & FacilitiesMeet your EPC and disclosure obligations while running cost and carbon fallAgriculture & Urban FarmingProtect your yield and soil while using less water and fertiliserPoultry FarmingProve you control the water your birds drink, with biofilm and pathogens cleared and the evidence in handLocal AuthoritiesMove your estate towards net zero with compliant assets, funded to saveEmerging MarketsBuild investable, accreditation-ready infrastructure on reliable water, sanitation and powerHotels, Hospitality & LeisureKeep guests safe and pools open, with Legionella risk controlled and pool-hall cost cutData CentresCut the cost and water your cooling burns, and harden Legionella control, without touching uptimeFood & Beverage ProcessingCut your trade-effluent bill and hold consent, without touching food safety or uptime
Tools
Ask HESCase StudiesInsightsAbout
Contact Us
Viticulture

University research proved higher yield with around a quarter less irrigation water

Peer research at the University of California, Davis tested treating vineyard irrigation. It kept the emitters clean, lifted how evenly water reached each vine, and raised berry yield while cutting both water and energy.

39 to 90% higher berry yield per vine, with roughly 26% less irrigation water and about 663 dollars per acre saved (UC Davis).

The challenge

In viticulture, irrigation has to do two jobs at once: deliver water evenly across the block, and do it without fouling the emitters that carry it. Fouling and uneven distribution cost both water and yield.

A research programme at the University of California, Davis set out to measure what treating the irrigation water could do for distribution, water use and yield.

What we did

The irrigation water was treated to keep the emitters clean and improve how evenly water reached each vine. Water use, energy, distribution uniformity and yield were measured over multiple seasons.

The result

More fruit, less water and energy.

39 to 90%Higher berry yield per vine
~26%Less irrigation water, about 610 dollars per acre, plus about 53 dollars per acre of energy
0.70 to 0.95Improvement in irrigation distribution uniformity

Mycorrhizal colonisation of the roots also rose sharply, by around 80% at full irrigation and 150% under deficit, which helps explain the gain in water-use efficiency.

University research

The work was carried out as peer research at the University of California, Davis, over multiple seasons and independent of any supplier.

Why it matters

For growers, water and yield usually pull against each other. This shows they do not have to: cleaner, more evenly distributed irrigation can lift yield while using around a quarter less water. It is the input-efficiency result the agriculture sector is built around.

Explore Agriculture & Urban Farming
Speak to the Team

Tell us your challenge

Tell us the cost, the risk or the obligation you are facing. A senior member of our team will respond, in confidence, with how we would help.

Every enquiry is handled in strict confidence.